The
following analysis is based strictly on the 3 year trend performance of each player. Although the statistical
significance of the 3 consecutive year trending players is questionable
due to the small sample sizes, you will see that some of the results are overwhelmingly one
sided, lending some credence to their relevancy. The production is measured using our
Fantasy Production Indicator (FPI).
Up-Trending
Hitters
Last year, a majority of the "up trending" 3 year
players failed to reach the success of their previous season. In fact, that's
about the same result we've been finding every year since 1999.
Between 20-27% of players that are consistently improving over the
previous 3 year
stretch, continue that trend through their 4th season. The statistical
results from the up trending players points to a reversal of the trend
for batters!
Year
after 3 consecutive Uptrend Seasons |
Percentage
Continuing UpTrend |
1999 |
27% |
2000 |
25% |
2001 |
26% |
2002 |
20% |
2003 |
25% |
2004 |
23% |
2005 |
25% |
Conclusion: It's difficult to string
4 consecutive rising seasons, we find that hitters reach a plateau within 3 or
so full seasons...although many of the superior players will continue
increase production on and off during their career, the explosive growth
experienced early on....dissipates....and the odds of 4 consecutive
rising seasons is significantly less than probable after a string of 3.
There is a much higher likelihood of decline in those players over 30,
below is a split of the players that fall into this category:
Up Trending 3+ YRS |
Age |
Are you a betting man? |
Criag Biggio |
40 |
5 out of 6 of
these players are very unlikely to experience an increase in
production this year as they all are considered to be outside of
the optimal Age range.
|
Moises Alou |
39 |
Ken Griffey Jr. |
36 |
Mark Sweeney |
32 |
David Dellucci |
32 |
David Ortiz |
30 |
Julio Lugo |
29 |
It's likely
that 4 out of 7 of these players will not post another up
trending fantasy production season. Although all are in the
optimal age range, stringing 4 consecutive up trending seasons
doesn't happen frequently.
|
Michael Young |
29 |
Ryan Freel |
29 |
Brian Roberts |
28 |
Travis Hafner |
28 |
Chone Figgins |
28 |
Mark Teixeira |
25 |
Down-Trending
Hitters
On draft day, there we've jotted down a
list of players that you should avoid based on sentimental value. These
are player who have had 3 consecutive "Dropping Production"
seasons. Our research has shown that about 70% of the "over 30 years old"
hitters continue the downtrend after 3 consecutive "Production
Loss" seasons. (The sample size of the "under 29" is small
and the results are inconclusive...thus we are limiting this area of the
study to those over 29.)
Year
after 3 consecutive Down-trend Seasons |
Percentage
Continuing Down-Trend (>30) |
1999 |
69% |
2000 |
67% |
2001 |
73% |
2002 |
71% |
2003 |
68% |
2004 |
72% |
2005 |
75% |
Conclusion: Although some of the
players listed below may have a slight pop up in performance, none are
expected to come near the production that once made them superstars. So
unless you can draft them at current valuations, they are not worth
inflated prices.
Down |
Age |
|
Marquis Grissom |
38 |
Be very weary!
Although some of these players may improve slightly in
2005 based on the strength of their supporting cast, none will
come near their peak production numbers. |
Jeff Bagwell |
37 |
Sammy Sosa |
37 |
Bernie Williams |
37 |
Mike Piazza |
37 |
Jose Valentin |
36 |
Scott Spiezio |
33 |
All of the
players to the left still have the potential to bounce back from their 2004
lows, but do consider that 3 out of 5 may not.
|
Brian Daubach |
33 |
Magglio Ordonez |
31 |
Vladimir Guerrero |
29 |
Ramon Vazquez |
29 |
Down-Trending
Pitchers
60-70% of
the "over 30" pitchers continue the downtrend after 3 consecutive
"Production Loss" seasons. The sample size of the
"under 30" is small and the results are very inconclusive.
Year
after 3 consecutive Downtrend Seasons |
Percentage
Continuing Decline (>30) |
1999 |
67% |
2000 |
68% |
2001 |
65% |
2002 |
67% |
2003 |
70% |
2004 |
60% |
2005 |
67% |
Conclusion:
A majority of the "over 30" down trending pitchers listed in
the analysis below have been given notice to that they are likely to
continue their fall from grace....and may be sold for glue.....
Down Trending |
AGE |
|
Mike Remlinger |
39 |
Most of the players
listed to the left have earned their stripes and will
continue to see adequate playing time. However their star has
fallen considerably and we should not expect the numbers
they once posted.
|
Greg Maddux |
39 |
Mike Stanton |
38 |
Troy Percival |
36 |
Kirk Rueter |
35 |
Felix Rodriguez |
33 |
Matt Clement |
31 |
Chad Bradford |
31 |
Wade Miller |
29 |
Many of the players to the left in yellow are
coming off of arm injured seasons and with youth on their side
they could reverse the trend. |
Randy Wolf |
29 |
Vicente Padilla |
28 |
Mark Mulder |
28 |
Jorge Julio |
26 |
Byung-Hyun Kim |
26 |
Up-Trending
Pitchers
There was not enough of a sample, based on the
criteria, to make an observation.
A Final Word
Please understand that some of the
Down Trending players are still some of the best in the game at their
respective position (ie. Mike
Piazza - C ) however they may not
be worth an over-inflated draft price, in fact they should be had at
a discount. Also realize that some of the declining players are there
because of injuries during the past few seasons, but that in itself is a
cautionary concern.
Also consider that
although players have been
slowing declining with their overall average fantasy worth per plate
appearance (FPI),
players such as Vladimir Guerrero is still expected
to produce 15% better than the average counterpart at his position this
year. Certainly he
is still an asset on any fantasy
team.
In conclusion,
it's difficult to pin point who will continue a trend from this
analysis, and who will not. Our projections take much more information
into account. As always, a whole lot of it depends on something we can
not measure and that is..... desire (contact year, love of the game,
etc). However taken as a whole, if I'm debating between two very similar
players and one of them falls into one of the negative categories
mentioned, then I will certainly side with the percentages.